Notable Cases

Background: D.C. was an inmate within the Georgia Department of Corrections who faced a serious charge of murdering another inmate. This case had languished for several years, with previous representation leading to continued delays and uncertainty for D.C.

Brandon Clark’s Approach: Upon taking on the representation, Clark adopted a proactive and trial-focused strategy. Rather than seeking further continuances, he immediately began preparing for trial, meticulously reviewing evidence and developing a strong defense. He announced his readiness to proceed, signaling his confidence in his client’s case.

Outcome: Shortly before the scheduled trial date, the State of Georgia made the significant decision to dismiss all charges against D.C.

Significance: This outcome demonstrates Clark’s ability to cut through delays and aggressively prepare a case for trial, ultimately leading to the complete exoneration of his client. It highlights his commitment to moving cases forward and achieving justice for his clients, even in challenging circumstances within the correctional system.

Background: K.M. was involved in a tragic incident where he shot and killed a friend. The State subsequently charged him with felony manslaughter, a serious offense with potentially life-altering consequences.

Brandon Clark’s Approach: Recognizing the nuances of the situation, Clark presented K.M.’s defense directly to a jury. His strategy focused on providing the jury with a clear understanding of the circumstances surrounding the incident and arguing for a lesser charge.

Outcome: The jury carefully considered the evidence and agreed with the defense’s arguments, finding K.M. guilty only of a misdemeanor. As a result, K.M. received a sentence of 12 months of misdemeanor probation.

Significance: This case exemplifies Clark’s skill in presenting a compelling defense to a jury, leading to a significantly reduced charge and sentence for his client. K.M. was able to complete his probation and move forward with his life without the burden of a felony conviction, allowing him to fully participate in society and raise his family.

Background: K.W. was a young individual, barely 17 years old, when he was accused of multiple severe felonies, including rape, sodomy, incest, and other sexual offenses. These charges carried devastating potential consequences for his future.

Brandon Clark’s Approach: Upon thoroughly reviewing the discovery and evidence presented by the prosecution, Clark became convinced of his client’s innocence. To expedite the process and protect his client from prolonged uncertainty, he filed a Statutory Demand for Speedy Trial, requiring the State to bring the case to trial within a specific timeframe.

Outcome: After a multi-day jury trial where Clark presented a robust defense highlighting the inconsistencies and lack of evidence against K.W., the jury returned a verdict of not guilty on all charges.

Significance: This case underscores Clark’s keen ability to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and his willingness to aggressively advocate for his clients’ innocence. By demanding a speedy trial and effectively presenting his client’s defense, he secured a complete acquittal for a young man facing extremely serious allegations, allowing him to move forward with his life free from these accusations.